Michigan Supreme Court Term
Typos
Supreme Court Elections
2010 Appellate Bench Bar Conference
Pre-Arrest Silence and Tacit Admissions
Credibility Determinations at Ginther Hearings
Medical Malpractice Kerfuffle
Slip and Fall
Child Support and Termination of Parental Rights
Lost
Knife Length
People v Waterstone
United States v Comstock
Graham v Florida
What is Truth?
When a Prosecutor Voluntarily Dimisses a Case
People v Houthoofd
Streaming Oral Argument
Remand to a Different Judge
Disqualifying Prosecutor
Sex Offender Registration and HYTA
Doubling the sentence for drug offenses
Rights of Parents
Class Certification
Drinking and Driving
ARCHIVES
Confrontation Blog
Crim Law
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Direct Appeal (CA10 Criminal Cases)
Fourth Amendment
Have Opinion Will Travel
How Appealing
Michigan Bankruptcy Law
Michigan Collection Law
Michigan Construction Law
Michigan Drunk Driving
Michigan Elder Law
Michigan Health Care Law
Michigan Long Term Disability Law
Michigan Real Estate Law
Michigan Workers' Compensation Law
Military Veteran Law
Ninth Circuit Criminal Appeal
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law and Policy
Sixth Circuit Blog
Split Circuits
The Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog
Law Offices Website
Blog Home
|
You will be asked about thisby Michael B. Skinner · Friday May 15, 2009 4:50 pm PERMALINK
If you do criminal defense, you will get questions about the 180 day rule. Michigan requires that defendants incarcerated in prison be brought to trial on new charges within 180 days of the prosecutor being notified of the defendant's incarceration. People v Davis stands for the simple proposition that the prosecution only needs to begin the formal process that will bring the defendant to trial within 180 days; it does not need to actually start or even complete the trial within 180 days. |