Go to Law Offices of Michael B. Skinner

Recent Entries
Michigan Supreme Court Term
Typos
Supreme Court Elections
2010 Appellate Bench Bar Conference
Pre-Arrest Silence and Tacit Admissions
Credibility Determinations at Ginther Hearings
Medical Malpractice Kerfuffle
Slip and Fall
Child Support and Termination of Parental Rights
Lost
Knife Length
People v Waterstone
United States v Comstock
Graham v Florida
What is Truth?
When a Prosecutor Voluntarily Dimisses a Case
People v Houthoofd
Streaming Oral Argument
Remand to a Different Judge
Disqualifying Prosecutor
Sex Offender Registration and HYTA
Doubling the sentence for drug offenses
Rights of Parents
Class Certification
Drinking and Driving


ARCHIVES

RSS Feed

Blogroll
Confrontation Blog
Crim Law
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Direct Appeal (CA10 Criminal Cases)
Fourth Amendment
Have Opinion Will Travel
How Appealing
Michigan Bankruptcy Law
Michigan Collection Law
Michigan Construction Law
Michigan Drunk Driving
Michigan Elder Law
Michigan Health Care Law
Michigan Long Term Disability Law
Michigan Real Estate Law
Michigan Workers' Compensation Law
Military Veteran Law
Ninth Circuit Criminal Appeal
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law and Policy
Sixth Circuit Blog
Split Circuits
The Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog


© 2005  Michael B. Skinner Law Offices Website
Blog Home
Michigan Appellate Law

Correction of Presentence Investigation Report


by Michael B. Skinner · Friday July 10, 2009 10:06 am  PERMALINK
Defendants often learn after conviction, as they read over their PSIRs in their cells, that there are errors in their PSIRs that were not addressed at sentencing. How can these errors be corrected? If the defendant was convicted a long time ago, it will be more difficult, but I believe that the correct rule is that, as a record of the court, the court has the inherent authority to correct errors at anytime — of course, you need to convince the judge that the error is actually an error.

But if the defendant discovers the error in a more timely manner — say, within six months of his sentencing — he can file a motion in the circuit court and both statutory law (MCL 769.34(10)) and court rule (MCR 6.429(C)) permit this. In People v Lloyd, the Court of Appeals confirmed that defendants can file motions to for "resentencing" solely to correct errors in the PSIR (in Lloyd's case, he was convicted of felony firearm which carries a flat two year sentence, so there was nothing to argue about the length of the sentence in his motion).