Go to Law Offices of Michael B. Skinner

Recent Entries
Michigan Supreme Court Term
Typos
Supreme Court Elections
2010 Appellate Bench Bar Conference
Pre-Arrest Silence and Tacit Admissions
Credibility Determinations at Ginther Hearings
Medical Malpractice Kerfuffle
Slip and Fall
Child Support and Termination of Parental Rights
Lost
Knife Length
People v Waterstone
United States v Comstock
Graham v Florida
What is Truth?
When a Prosecutor Voluntarily Dimisses a Case
People v Houthoofd
Streaming Oral Argument
Remand to a Different Judge
Disqualifying Prosecutor
Sex Offender Registration and HYTA
Doubling the sentence for drug offenses
Rights of Parents
Class Certification
Drinking and Driving


ARCHIVES

RSS Feed

Blogroll
Confrontation Blog
Crim Law
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Direct Appeal (CA10 Criminal Cases)
Fourth Amendment
Have Opinion Will Travel
How Appealing
Michigan Bankruptcy Law
Michigan Collection Law
Michigan Construction Law
Michigan Drunk Driving
Michigan Elder Law
Michigan Health Care Law
Michigan Long Term Disability Law
Michigan Real Estate Law
Michigan Workers' Compensation Law
Military Veteran Law
Ninth Circuit Criminal Appeal
SCOTUSblog
Sentencing Law and Policy
Sixth Circuit Blog
Split Circuits
The Volokh Conspiracy
Wall Street Journal Law Blog


© 2005  Michael B. Skinner Law Offices Website
Blog Home
Michigan Appellate Law

Joinder and Severance in Criminal Cases


The court rule reigns supreme
by Michael B. Skinner · Friday July 10, 2009 10:11 pm  PERMALINK
In People v Williams, the Michigan Supreme Court considered the joinder of two separate drug cases tried to a single jury. Under People v Tobey, 401 Mich 141 (1977). the offenses would have had to have been tried separately because they were unrelated. However, in 1989, the Michigan Supreme Court adopted MCR 6.120, which had a broader interpretation of when offenses are related for joinder purposes. Because the rule was adopted post-Tobey, it supersedes the holding of Tobey. And under 6.120, joinder of the defendant's cases was permissible. That's the case (all 26 pages of it) in a nutshell.

So, in the future, ignore Tobey and check the court rules instead for all your joinder and severance questions.